top of page

Why is blue-collar work still male-dominated?

In the 20th century, women smashed glass ceilings across the world. But continued progress is not inevitable. Recent developments in the U.S. pose a stark warning: working-class women’s employment may be in jeopardy.

In the U.S., female school leavers are stuck in poorly paid “pink collar” jobs: as social workers, secretaries, beauticians, retail assistants, and waitresses. Mechanics, manufacturing, and other skilled manual jobs remain overwhelmingly male.

Why is this? There are at least four possible explanations.


Physical strength is required in some manual roles—like construction in India and China. But in Western warehouses and factories, bulging biceps have been displaced by robots.


Gender ideologies are pervasive. Stereotyped as caring and agreeable, working-class women may gravitate toward social care, retail, and hospitality. Conformity is also motivated by the desire for peer approval. With limited opportunity to collectively break out of this straitjacket, secondary school (or high school) graduates follow established norms.

So, given the social costs of transgressing gender boundaries, women move upwards, but not sideways—or so it was famously argued by Paula England, whose article has over 1,600 citations. But does ideology trump economics? Do poor, working-class women willingly forgo lucrative job opportunities?

Low Demand?

Low demand may be part of the problem. “Good jobs” for high school graduates have dwindled. ​​Manufacturing and other manual-intensive occupations that on average paid substantially higher salaries than services have disappeared.

Job polarization between the mid-1990s and mid-2010s (Tyson 2021)
Evolution of total employment by type of occupation based on skills, normalized to 1980 value (Duran-Franch 2020)

Having lost jobs in manufacturing, American men increasingly pursue service and clerical occupations, as shown by Joana Duran-Franch. They have leaped ahead in these job queues. Unlike working-class women, they are not stymied by unaffordable child care. More importantly, employers anticipate that men will work longer hours, so may statistically discriminate in their favor. The overall downturn in demand means that even as “pink collar” jobs are growing, women lose out.

Men have capitalized on the growth in interpersonal work, even though it was historically feminine. Economics can trump culture! Gender stereotypes may well be pervasive, but individuals shift tack when they eye sufficient rewards.

Evolution of the share of low-educated employment, gender ratio, and wage by occupation type (Duran-Franch 2020)


Mining, manufacturing, and transportation have become increasingly automated. Workers have been displaced from routine tasks—as shown by Daron Acemoglu and Pascual Restrepo.

In the U.S., this may have positive consequences for productivity and workers might move into better jobs, as argued by David Autor. Indeed, some are! But as Duran-Franch’s analysis suggests, this transition is predominantly male.

There are strong parallels in emerging economies. Even if they industrialize, this is unlikely to generate mass employment. India’s industrial sector remains small and capital intensive. Job queues are long, and men are at the front. Since manufacturing demand can be met by men, employers seldom diversify.

Even as economies become more technologically innovative, working-class women from Michigan and Mumbai may be left far behind.

This blog was originally published by Brookings.

1,316 views3 comments

Recent Posts

See All

3 Kommentare

Unknown member
17. Aug. 2022

Hi! I recently went camping with my family, but an unpleasant situation occurred and the car stopped moving. As it turned out, the fault was old bearings. I was advised to go to a bearing store, which I immediately did. Frankly speaking I was surprised with the quality of the bearings they sent me, they were perfect. Now I am definitely not afraid of a repeat of this situation!

Gefällt mir

Unknown member
06. Jan. 2022

Miguel is totally right, strength plays a massive role in blue-collar jobs for heavy industry, even when most processes are automated and males have a huge advantage. Maybe statistics for light industry are totally biased in favour of women.

I also believe we cannot simply rule out biological differences on interests. While it is (and will be) controversial to say how much of a role they play in contrast with culture, literature largely supports there is some.

Congrats on your ACX grant :)

Gefällt mir

Unknown member
17. Dez. 2021

In manufacturing, I suppose that there is a difference between light industry and heavy industry; at least in Portugal, the canned fish industry in the most southern region was perhaps almost 100% female, and I think the textile and shoes industries in the north are also mainly female. In contrast, the metallurgical industry near Lisbon is mostly male.

Gefällt mir
bottom of page